Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preset functions for True/False summatives? #2

Closed
jmdetect opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Preset functions for True/False summatives? #2

jmdetect opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jmdetect
Copy link

jmdetect commented Jun 2, 2021

Fantastic idea from the insight on surface form competition, and it does solve the problem well. It's impressive indeed.

Have you considered adding preset functions, for the case of "Does this make sense?" / "Is this truthful?" calls with True/False 1-token responses and so forth?

Right now we maintain a list of FALSE, false ... etc ... this seems much better. It seems like how we as humans psychologically process the world and are affected by similar words/multiple word senses, fascinating...

I was sad to see this must use restricted pre=specified set of tokens to rebalance, but that makes sense by necessity of reducing complexity.

@ari-holtzman
Copy link
Collaborator

Interesting suggestion!

I could definitely imagine this doing well, though the hope would be that PMI_DC already largely compensates for this effect by alleviating surface form competition.

Regardless, this repo in particular is maintained to reproduce precisely what we did in the paper, so we wouldn't want to diverge from the experiments we reported here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants