Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Replace AppVeyor with GitHub Actions #2845

Open
vlsi opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

CI: Replace AppVeyor with GitHub Actions #2845

vlsi opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
chore ci-related Continuous integration

Comments

@vlsi
Copy link
Member

vlsi commented Mar 10, 2023

GitHub Actions supports several PostgreSQL versions on Windows machines, so we could use them instead of AppVeyor: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/setup-postgresql-for-linux-macos-windows

AppVeyor is often slow, and it produced false positives too often.

It would be great if someone submitted a PR to replace AppVeyor with https://github.com/marketplace/actions/setup-postgresql-for-linux-macos-windows or something like that.

@vlsi vlsi added ci-related Continuous integration chore labels Mar 10, 2023
@ganesh47
Copy link

ganesh47 commented Apr 4, 2023

Can i work on this, seems like a good one for a first-time-contributor here, unless someone else is already at this ?

  • Do you want this integrated with your existing workflow or can this be a new workflow, with the same triggers as defined in appveyor?
  • Shall go over the contributor-guidelines, but believe, it should be good, if the CI job runs predictably with windows based tests......

@davecramer
Copy link
Member

Can i work on this, seems like a good one for a first-time-contributor here, unless someone else is already at this ?
By all means please do

  • Do you want this integrated with your existing workflow or can this be a new workflow, with the same triggers as defined in appveyor?
    No real requirements here
  • Shall go over the contributor-guidelines, but believe, it should be good, if the CI job runs predictably with windows based tests......

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore ci-related Continuous integration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants