Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

End user feedback #27

Open
3 of 4 tasks
harriscw opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #29 or #63
Open
3 of 4 tasks

End user feedback #27

harriscw opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #29 or #63
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation update existing check Proposal to refine an existing check function

Comments

@harriscw
Copy link
Collaborator

harriscw commented Feb 9, 2023

  • Missing lab units - remove NEGATIVE/POSITIVE/NOT DONE results. dont care about units
  • Add language like "commonly this issue is related to....". Team to draft
  • LDIAM check ideas:
    • at very least add language.
    • Add summary to return message, e.g. x not done, y not evaluable, z done and evaluable but missing
    • Suggest end users to filtering excel doc
    • Possibly change to 1. filter out not done/not evaluable. 2. only display remaining missing TRSTRESN records. Provide a summary of filtered out records alerting the end user
  • Death issues, team will supply updated logic
@harriscw harriscw reopened this Feb 10, 2023
@sarabodach sarabodach linked a pull request Mar 28, 2023 that will close this issue
@sarabodach sarabodach added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation update existing check Proposal to refine an existing check function labels Jun 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation update existing check Proposal to refine an existing check function
Projects
None yet
2 participants