Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve fiability of DependencyAnalyzer #3470

Closed
jecisc opened this issue Jun 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Improve fiability of DependencyAnalyzer #3470

jecisc opened this issue Jun 6, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@jecisc
Copy link
Member

jecisc commented Jun 6, 2019

In some cases, the DependencyAnalyzer cannot be sure of some dependencies because there are multiple methods of the same name in the image and it fails to infer which is the right one.

But when showing dependencies at the level of the package, it does not mean that it cannot know from which package the dependency is from.

Example:

Screenshot 2019-06-06 at 18 04 30

On this screen, we see that a method is implemented on 5 objects but the 5 are in the same package. Thus we are sure of the dependency in that case. It would be great of the tool could manage this case.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 11, 2020

To limit bug bankruptcy (see https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2012/07/09/software-inventory/) this issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity in 6 months. If no further activity occurs, it might be closed. If this issue remains important to you, please comment to reactivate the issue. Thank you for your contributions.

Joel on Software
Imagine, for a moment, that you came upon a bread factory for the first time. At first it just looks like a jumble of incomprehensible machinery with a few people buzzing around. As your eyes adjus…

@stale stale bot added the stale label Feb 11, 2020
@jecisc
Copy link
Member Author

jecisc commented Feb 11, 2020

keep it

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Feb 11, 2020
@guillep
Copy link
Member

guillep commented Jan 27, 2023

This issue looks more like a small project than an actionable issue.
I propose we move it to a wiki with potential projects for people to contribute.
I'm collecting all these.
Could be a great basis for GSOC.

@guillep guillep closed this as completed Jan 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants