Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I got inexplicable results on “mnist_pixel”,I didn't find the reason. #27

Closed
ziganlan opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@ziganlan
Copy link

I did not modify any parameters, but I got a val_accuracy about 0.11 till many epochs:
55000/55000 [==============================] - 164s 3ms/step - loss: 2.3037 - accuracy: 0.1120 - val_loss: 2.3015 - val_accuracy: 0.1135

Is there any special setting in this example("mnist_pixel")?

ps: I try other examples too, and the result seems good.

@ziganlan
Copy link
Author

I got it . The possible reason maybe my input data. The result become good after input data normalization.

@philipperemy
Copy link
Owner

Yeah it should work correctly :)

Happy to hear that it worked!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants