Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

brush/cursor alignment #828

Closed
natrader opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

brush/cursor alignment #828

natrader opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@natrader
Copy link

When I make a stroke with the brush tool, the stroke shows up to the left and a little higher than where my cursor shows it should be. Not sure if this is a glitch or something that I can fix.

@photopea
Copy link
Owner

Hi. Are you using Firefox and a large-resolution screen? It is a known bug in Firefox, and they refuse to fix it for 4 years. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1107646 . Please use a different browser, until they fix it.

@natrader
Copy link
Author

thank you, is there another browser that you could recommend?

@photopea
Copy link
Owner

Any other than Firefox. Like Chrome, Opera, Edge, Safari etc.

@SebastianZ
Copy link

It is a known bug in Firefox, and they refuse to fix it for 4 years. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1107646 . Please use a different browser, until they fix it.

Any other than Firefox. Like Chrome, Opera, Edge, Safari etc.

Two things need to be clarified here. First, Mozilla obviously doesn't "refuse" to implement image-set(), they just have limited resources and other priorities. Second, having a look at caniuse.com and making some tests by my own in Chrome, Opera and Edge show that Edge has also does not support image-set() yet. And Chrome and Opera require to prefix it with -webkit-. I can't test Safari, though it looks like it has some limitations, too.

Sebastian

@photopea
Copy link
Owner

Yes, I know that they have -webkit-image-set. But it is still bether than nothing in Firefox.

The Edge browser is for Windows 10 only, and as long as it stays this way, I don't think about it as a browser, that will still be here in the future.

By "refuse" I mean, that they do not give the issue a necessary attention and resources, as it deserves (in my oppinion). On the other hand, some of features that they do invest resources into, are not that important in my oppinion. So in general, I think the maintenance and management behind Firefox development is a bit wrong now, and I strongly hope that Firefox will be replaced by better browsers in the future.

@SebastianZ
Copy link

Yes, I know that they have -webkit-image-set. But it is still bether than nothing in Firefox.

Sure, just wanted to clarify that.

The Edge browser is for Windows 10 only, and as long as it stays this way, I don't think about it as a browser, that will still be here in the future.

Though you recommended it in your previous post, indicating it can handle the use case, which it currently cannot, unfortunately.

By "refuse" I mean, that they do not give the issue a necessary attention and resources, as it deserves (in my oppinion).

Well, that's your opinion. Btw. it's also mine, that's why I'm on CC on the bug you referred to. Nonetheless there are many, many more features I think should get priority, though are neglected by implementors. And that not only applies to Mozilla, but to all browser implementors. It always depends on the priorities and resources when something gets implemented.

Sebastian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants