Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about using caffe-deconvnet #10

Open
w20ss11 opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Questions about using caffe-deconvnet #10

w20ss11 opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@w20ss11
Copy link

w20ss11 commented Oct 11, 2016

Thanks for releasing your excellent work. I have run the demo in the deconvnet-python-demo file folder ,and I got the outputs. The following pictures are originated from “pool5” as shown in your python code.

11111111111
333333333333

Besides, I want know how to get the deconvolutional outputs from other layers’ feature map. I have tried to change some code in line 68 of the test_deconv.py(change pool5 to pool4). However, I met some errors here.
qq 20161011172605

In addition, Could you tell me how to use other models to perform deconvolution and draw the outputs?
Thank you very much.

@piergiaj
Copy link
Owner

You'll have to change the model defined in invnet.prototxt to start at the correct layer (for example, pool4 instead of pool 5), which should be as simple as deleting a few extra layers.

To make this work with other models, you'll have to create the inverse model file for it (like the invnet.prototxt file) and connect the switches and other inputs to the model.

@Pratyeka
Copy link

Pratyeka commented Nov 2, 2016

Thanks for your codes!I field to modify the new Caffe,got a lot of trouble, Where can I download the Caffe you used for deconvnet?3Q very much!

@GloryZhao
Copy link

Hello@w20ss11
I have the same problem with you.Have you already solved it ?And Can you give me some advises to work it out. 3Q very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants