Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uniformly preprocess macroscopic gene set by default #56

Closed
qinqian opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #92
Closed

uniformly preprocess macroscopic gene set by default #56

qinqian opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #92
Assignees
Labels
performance Performance python Pull requests that update Python code
Milestone

Comments

@qinqian
Copy link
Collaborator

qinqian commented Feb 6, 2023

We want to analyze the PBMC data set with default settings of up to 2000 highly variable genes rather than the top 3 dynamical genes.

I added pipeline stages for pbmc68k and model 2 training with up to 2000 highly variable genes and collected metrics using the dvc pipeline.

@qinqian qinqian self-assigned this Feb 6, 2023
@qinqian qinqian added the performance Performance label Feb 6, 2023
@cameronraysmith cameronraysmith changed the title PBMC data test with default top variable gene selection analyze PBMC data set with default gene selection Feb 6, 2023
@cameronraysmith cameronraysmith added the python Pull requests that update Python code label Feb 6, 2023
@cameronraysmith cameronraysmith added this to the model milestone Feb 13, 2023
@cameronraysmith cameronraysmith modified the milestones: model, 0.1.2 Mar 29, 2023
@cameronraysmith cameronraysmith self-assigned this Mar 30, 2023
@cameronraysmith cameronraysmith changed the title analyze PBMC data set with default gene selection uniformly preprocess macroscopic gene set by default Mar 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Performance python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants