Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support deploying one TiDB Cluster across multiple regions or data centers #2816

Open
10 of 13 tasks
DanielZhangQD opened this issue Jun 27, 2020 · 7 comments
Open
10 of 13 tasks

Comments

@DanielZhangQD
Copy link
Contributor

DanielZhangQD commented Jun 27, 2020

Description

Several users request the ability to deploy TiDB Clusters across multiple Kubernetes clusters that deployed in different regions or data centers to achieve HA in region or data center level.
In addition, users can also deploy applications in different regions/data centers to access the TiDB/TiKV Pods in the local region/data center to reduce the latency.

Category

Feature

Value

  • Achieve HA in the region or data center level
  • Reduce the latency of cross-region access

TODO list

Workload Estimation

60

Time

DevProgress: 45%
QAProgress: 0%
DocProgress: 0%

GanttProgress: 20%
GanttStart: 2020-07-13
GanttDue: 2020-12-30

@mikechengwei
Copy link
Contributor

I can help with this feature.

@DanielZhangQD
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mikechengwei Thanks for your help!
Which issue above do you want to take?

@mikechengwei
Copy link
Contributor

I can finish PO feature and i can do #2929 firstly.
I have a question about other cluster join current cluster by specify discovery url. Should the domain systems of these two clusters ensure that they can communicate with each other?

@mikechengwei
Copy link
Contributor

I go to complete other issues, this pr is left to others to do.

@uglyengineer uglyengineer moved this from Backlogs to Develop in Longterm P0 Backlog Kanban Aug 7, 2020
@L3T
Copy link
Contributor

L3T commented Aug 26, 2020

/assign

@DanielZhangQD
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @L3T

@scsldb
Copy link

scsldb commented Sep 19, 2020

Reason for reprioritization: development complete, testing in progress, more important current development tasks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants