Additional parent classes are forced to be on a new line always. Is this intentional?

[ZakTaccardi]

Is reformatting:

import kotlinx.coroutines.CoroutineScope

internal abstract class MyParentClass(
    param1: String,
    param2: String
)

internal class MyChildClass(
    scope: CoroutineScope
) : MyParentClass(
    param1 = "one",
    param2 = "two"
), CoroutineScope by scope

to be:

import kotlinx.coroutines.CoroutineScope

internal abstract class MyParentClass(
    param1: String,
    param2: String
)

internal class MyChildClass(
    scope: CoroutineScope
) : MyParentClass(
    param1 = "one",
    param2 = "two"
),
    CoroutineScope by scope

a bug? the error is Missing newline after "," and violates the wrapping rule.

My take here is that the following format looks...off (bc it can fit on the same line):

),
    CoroutineScope by scope

Using version 0.48.2

[paul-dingemans]

I am not sure whether to classify it as a bug or not. On one hand, I do agree that it looks less pretty than the original code. The argument bc it can fit on the same line is not a convincing argument as that depends on the size of your indent. Also the Kotlin coding conventions do not provide an example that fits with your example. Based on the examples, I think that it should be formatted something like:

internal class MyChildClass(
    scope: CoroutineScope
) : MyParentClass(
        param1 = "one",
        param2 = "two"
    ),
    CoroutineScope by scope

This can best be resolved when implementing #1349.

[ZakTaccardi]

internal class MyChildClass(
    scope: CoroutineScope
) : MyParentClass(
        param1 = "one",
        param2 = "two"
    ),
    CoroutineScope by scope

actually, yeah, this looks good 👍

[paul-dingemans]

Implemented by #1349

[paul-dingemans]

See #2119