New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Local spath-as-a-service in a cluster #315
Comments
Since we already have the Also, as a heads-up, I've started prototyping what an Operator 2.0 could look like, and all these kinds of "I need to slightly modify the pods" use-cases are top priority to figure out. |
Nice idea, but I worry that having another I'll try also another option to use Kubernetes Certificate Signing Requests feature, and hardcode these variables in my dockerfile: ENV SPAAS_URL="https://spaas:2020"
ENV SSL_CERT_FILE="/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/ca.crt" I hope this will work
Glad to hear that, I'm very looking forward 👍 |
No way, there is no opportunity to issue valid serving certificate
|
I found that there is |
Hi @WanzenBug,
We're faced with the problem of using kernel-module-injector in closed enviroments (enviroments without public internet connectivity)
So we decided to run spatch-as-a-service locally in same namespace for our platform.
I prepared patch for DRBD LINBIT/drbd#41 (I didn't sent it to drbd-dev mailing list yet)
The patch allows to set SPAAS_URL enviroment variable to communicate to while building drbd kernel module.
Currently we specify this URL as constant in our Dockerfile, but it does not allow to mount actual CA to the pod and specify CA file.
I'm thinking about modify operator to provide
extraVolumeMounts
functionality, eg:or adding two new variables like:
which option do you prefer or maybe do you have better idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: