"... -s 256" fails.

[drakpo]

-s 128 and lower values work, but...

python3 main.py -i RESULTS/b.wav -s 256
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/AAA/Downloads/SOUND/audio-randomizer-master/main.py", line 98, in
wavedict = load_wave(vars.input, int(vars.splits))
File "/Users/AAA/Downloads/SOUND/audio-randomizer-master/main.py", line 64, in load_wave
wavedict['frames'] = split_frames(wavefile, splits, wavedict['duration'])
File "/Users/AAA/Downloads/SOUND/audio-randomizer-master/main.py", line 50, in split_frames
wavefile.setpos(int(frame_position))
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.13_1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/wave.py", line 229, in setpos
raise Error('position not in range')
wave.Error: position not in range

[piscue]

I see the point and I would love to understand the use case. You wanna really create a very randomized file? Could you explain a bit?

For now I can capture the exception and print a better message

[piscue]

With the latest merge, you should be able to increase the number of the splits as much as you want, in a decrease skipping the last splits on the file, creating a "slightly" smaller output file.

Let me know if that fixes your use case, and still curious about the use of this tool from your side

[drakpo]

that is exactly what I want to do. was doing this with PyDub's AudioSegment, but was wanting to see if your version, without the library, could do it. will try this version.

[piscue]

with this version I can also increase a lot the number of splits 131072, increasing the waiting time for the output, and create a very interesting "noise" with a very scrambled file

docker run -v ~/Downloads:/wav piscue/audio-randomizer -i /wav/test_randomizer.wav -s 131072

[drakpo]

all works here, now, thank you.