Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove old unnecessary eslint rule #6693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 13, 2020
Merged

Conversation

bigtimebuddy
Copy link
Member

These inline rule exceptions are not longer necessary and is an artifact of earlier version of eslint.

@bigtimebuddy bigtimebuddy requested a review from Zyie June 12, 2020 18:07
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #6693 into dev will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev     #6693   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           15        15           
  Lines          671       671           
=========================================
  Hits           671       671           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ded2aeb...6b7e725. Read the comment docs.

@bigtimebuddy bigtimebuddy added the ✅ Ready To Merge Helpful when issues are in the queue waiting to get merged. This means the PR is completed and has t label Jun 13, 2020
@bigtimebuddy bigtimebuddy merged commit e158d02 into dev Jun 13, 2020
@bigtimebuddy bigtimebuddy deleted the dev-eslint-require-jsdoc branch June 13, 2020 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✅ Ready To Merge Helpful when issues are in the queue waiting to get merged. This means the PR is completed and has t
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants