Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PICA: Group results by library #181

Open
3 of 5 tasks
nichtich opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
3 of 5 tasks

PICA: Group results by library #181

nichtich opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@nichtich
Copy link
Collaborator

nichtich commented Oct 13, 2022

This request came up from internal presentation at K10plus: libraries likely want analysis limited to their own records. Each PICA record has a list of ILN identifiers (not included in current sample) of libraries holding the title. The user interface should be extended to allow for selecting a subset of records based on the ILN and get values such as

  • total numbers records
  • issues in records
  • terms

filtered to their subset.

Other functionality (completeness, functions...) is less relevant to this feature request so it depends on complexity of implementation. I don't know whether this can fully be done in the frontend or requires modification in backend as well.

The ILNs will be available in 001@$0 as a comma-separated list.

Sub tickets:

@pkiraly
Copy link
Owner

pkiraly commented Oct 14, 2022

@nichtich
Sounds doable by adding a "generate reports by" type of configuation, which tells the field of fields which will be used as an identifier for the separate reports. I need the following things from you:

  1. the name of data element which contains the ILN identifier
  2. a test file, which contains this data element
  3. an estimation of the number of the unique identifiers (how many libraries are covered by K10plus
  4. do you ave a design idea how to implement the selection?
  5. do you also need to get the current, "overall" view?

@nichtich
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This feature is definitely for phase two so better discuss in November. In short:

  1. Less than 1000 but most don't need this, so we can work with a limited list of less than a dozen ILN that want a report for their own data
  2. Maybe multiple instances of the client in different subdirectories that act on the same index with additional filter each? Or selection in the client for some tabs only.
  3. Yes!

@pkiraly pkiraly self-assigned this Oct 14, 2022
@pkiraly pkiraly added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 14, 2022
@pkiraly pkiraly added this to the PICA: 1.2 milestone Oct 14, 2022
@pkiraly pkiraly added enhancement and removed dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Nov 8, 2022
@nichtich
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nichtich commented Nov 24, 2022

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants