Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues without matching labels #5

Closed
jayvdb opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Issues without matching labels #5

jayvdb opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@jayvdb
Copy link

jayvdb commented Aug 12, 2018

yoda is designed around labels, that match established patterns.

If an issue doesnt have all the appropriate labels, it falls through the cracks.

So a tool is needed to find them and add the missing labels.

@jens-markussen
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for not responding earlier. Somehow E-mail notifications went to my spam folder. Will consider and respond soon.

@jens-markussen
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, a "label convention checker" tool is a good idea. We need to consider how to describe the policing to be done.

For example, we require strictly that all issues have a "T# - <type text" label. But only some types strictly require a severity/priority. Need to think how to express this in a good way.

(the actual checking is probably not a big deal).

Only then, the workaround is to export all (open) issues to excel and filter/check there, or use GitHub native issue searching. Of course the searching cannot easily find e.g. issues without a "T# - " label set...

Will put as enhancement and priority high.

@jens-markussen
Copy link
Contributor

I have not forgotten about this... The work-around I used for now is to brutely export into Excel. The Yoda exporter will further complain if e.g. there are multiple where by convention there should only be one. One example could be several "T# - <type text" labels at the same time....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants