Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conflict with Twitter Bootstrap #31

Closed
JonasNielsen opened this issue Nov 16, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

Conflict with Twitter Bootstrap #31

JonasNielsen opened this issue Nov 16, 2011 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@JonasNielsen
Copy link

Hi,

maskMoney starts acting weird and will not accept more than 3 digits if twitter/bootstrap is included in the document (http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/javascript.html)
Javascript files: https://github.com/seyhunak/twitter-bootstrap-rails/tree/master/vendor/assets/javascripts/twitter

Would you happen to know why?

I've been a happy user of maskmoney, so I'd really like to use both :-)

Cheers,
Jonas

@pbalduino
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Jonas. It's too bad. I like both too. I just queued this issue and I'll try to find a solution ASAP.

@ghost ghost assigned pbalduino Nov 17, 2011
@plentz
Copy link
Owner

plentz commented Apr 15, 2012

@JonasNielsen thanks for the bug report. I've looked at bootstrap code and didn't found anything that could generate a conflict. I will look deeper and post here if I find the problem. Btw, it could be something related to #26

@plentz
Copy link
Owner

plentz commented Apr 15, 2012

@JonasNielsen I can't reproduce the problem. I created this sample file trying to reproduce the problem. I've done tests loading bootstrap and then maskMoney, no problem happen. Loading maskMoney and then loading boostrap, neither. Could you please create a sample page(like the one I linked) that reproduces the error? It would be cool if you can tell me which browser/version you're using. Thanks a lot and sorry for taking so long to give you a proper feedback.

@plentz
Copy link
Owner

plentz commented Jan 20, 2013

closing since the user didn't gave feedback. also, since we've fixed #26, it's harder to this to happen again.

@plentz plentz closed this as completed Jan 20, 2013
@ghost ghost assigned plentz Jan 20, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants