Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error running rake db:find_indexes #54

Closed
chaadow opened this issue Apr 20, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Error running rake db:find_indexes #54

chaadow opened this issue Apr 20, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@chaadow
Copy link

chaadow commented Apr 20, 2015

Class: Site
Association type: has_many
Association options: {:through=>:users, :extend=>[]}
Exception: undefined method `options' for nil:NilClass
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/lol_dba.rb:129:in `block (2 levels) in check_for_indexes'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/lol_dba.rb:92:in `each_pair'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/lol_dba.rb:92:in `block in check_for_indexes'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/lol_dba.rb:86:in `each'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/lol_dba.rb:86:in `check_for_indexes'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/lol_dba.rb:179:in `simple_migration'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/lol_dba-2.0.0/lib/tasks/lol_dba.rake:7:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:240:in `call'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:240:in `block in execute'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:235:in `each'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:235:in `execute'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:179:in `block in invoke_with_call_chain'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.1.6/lib/ruby/2.1.0/monitor.rb:211:in `mon_synchronize'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:172:in `invoke_with_call_chain'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/task.rb:165:in `invoke'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:150:in `invoke_task'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:106:in `block (2 levels) in top_level'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:106:in `each'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:106:in `block in top_level'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:115:in `run_with_threads'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:100:in `top_level'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:78:in `block in run'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:176:in `standard_exception_handling'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/lib/rake/application.rb:75:in `run'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/rake-10.4.2/bin/rake:33:in `<top (required)>'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/bin/rake:23:in `load'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/bin/rake:23:in `<main>'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/bin/ruby_executable_hooks:15:in `eval'
/home/vagrant/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/bin/ruby_executable_hooks:15:in `<main>'
@chaadow
Copy link
Author

chaadow commented Apr 20, 2015

Similar to #53
Rails version : 3.2.21
lol_dba : 2.0.0

@chaadow
Copy link
Author

chaadow commented Apr 20, 2015

It generated the migration to run eventually, but I got this error message along the way

@plentz
Copy link
Owner

plentz commented Apr 20, 2015

@chaadow it's the same problem of #53 for sure, the difference is just that you're using the newest version. I'm closing it and you can keep an eye there, ok? :)

@plentz plentz closed this as completed Apr 20, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants