Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UNMASC and GATK RGs #15

Open
christianbosselmann opened this issue Mar 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

UNMASC and GATK RGs #15

christianbosselmann opened this issue Mar 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@christianbosselmann
Copy link

Hi Paul,

I am having some issues with the UNMASC pipeline. I have some samples after preprocessing (AGeNT Trimmer, aligned to hg19, BQSR), duplicates marked by Picard UmiAwareMarkDuplicatesWithMateCigar, and UMI tags extracted and added to the end of the read ID (UMI_VARCAL).

The UNMASC workflow terminates with the following error:

NULL Warning message: In fread(dict_chrom_fn, sep = "\t", header = FALSE, data.table = FALSE) : Stopped early on line 95. Expected 3 fields but found 6. Consider fill=TRUE and comment.char=. First discarded non-empty line: <<@RG ID:@A00620:188:HVMYMDSX2:4:1101:6470:1016 LB:157722_lib PL:ILLUMINA SM:157722 PU:@A00620:188:HVMYMDSX2:4:1101:6470:1016>>

Here is the image.rds: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_j8o6iaqWje1NE9Chw-keyIjOuYLePwF/view?usp=share_link

This looks to me like UNMASC does not expect the read group line to have six fields (RG, ID, LB, PL, SM, PU). However, this seems to be GATK standard and is obligatory for my preprocessing (esp. Picard).

I would greatly appreciate any help with this. Happy to provide any additional information. Thanks in advance.

Best wishes

Christian

@pllittle pllittle self-assigned this Apr 29, 2023
@pllittle
Copy link
Owner

Hi @christianbosselmann,

The issue seems to be with the dict_chrom_fn input file. Can you attach that file?

Best,
Paul

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants