Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate use of kube-linter and need for new step or not #119

Open
itewk opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate use of kube-linter and need for new step or not #119

itewk opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Projects

Comments

@itewk
Copy link
Contributor

itewk commented Feb 22, 2021

Purpose

Investigate https://github.com/stackrox/kube-linter and see if it fits in as another step implementer for the validate-environment-configuration step or if it falls into some new category.

Other musings

Currently we run validate-environment-configuration post deployment and use https://github.com/stelligent/config-lint. By guess is that both config-lint and kube-linter can be used post deployment by doing what we do now which is download the namespaces kube state. Buuuuut...... this kube-linter brings to mind that there is probably a reason to add a new step to validate the deployment config BEFORE deployment as well. The reason we are doing it after currently was the specific use case of looking for the runtime injection of a service mesh which can't be found in the static config because is injected by overlay operators at runtime, which means we probalby need both validate-environment-configuration and a new deployment-config-static-code-analysis step or something similar.

@itewk
Copy link
Contributor Author

itewk commented Feb 22, 2021

@BillBensing @ppremru @dwinchell FYI

@itewk itewk added this to To Do in ploigos via automation Feb 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
ploigos
To Do
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant