Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Initial step-size #92

Closed
pnkraemer opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #513
Closed

Initial step-size #92

pnkraemer opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #513
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pnkraemer
Copy link
Owner

#91 comments out some initial-step-size code to make things work. Please figure this out and put it back in.
@pnkraemer
Copy link
Owner Author

I think we can safely replace (u0 + dt0 * f(u0)) with (Df(u0)), which we have at this point. Thoughts?

@pnkraemer
Copy link
Owner Author

Maybe it is even easier/cleaner if we move the computation of the first time-step to the solve() functions, respectively. That would eliminate a bit of logic from _adaptive (which I think would be a good thing), and we can switch between initialisation methods more easily.

@pnkraemer pnkraemer mentioned this issue Feb 26, 2023
Closed
@pnkraemer pnkraemer added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 28, 2023
@pnkraemer pnkraemer linked a pull request Apr 8, 2023 that will close this issue
Initial step in solver signature #513
Merged
@pnkraemer pnkraemer mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Initial step in solver signature pnkraemer/probdiffeq
1 participant
@pnkraemer