License mis-match

[bastorer]

The paper mentions using the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, while the actual license file is the MIT No Attribution License (mostly - there's slight text difference, https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/). It doesn't look like CC BY 4 is OSI approved (at least, I can't find it in their approved list), but MIT-0 is.

Please unify the license choices with an OSI-approved license.

[This is part of JOSS review https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5554]

[bastorer]

Ah, sorry, the 'CC BY 4' in the paper looks like that is the license for the paper, not the code. Please disregard.