Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
@DavidKmn We believe it should be, due to the fact that it's a value type that is only mutated via an internal If anyone find issues with the current approach, though, we'd love to patch them up! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Was looking into the recent developments on DI you were doing on the
concurrency-updates-proto
branch. Was wondering is there a reason there is no locking in place for accessing the dependencies stored in storage? Seems to me that this can cause problems if multiple Tasks start accessing DependencyValues from different threads.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions