We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi! I am trying out your library. Very nice, that should save me time.
Without unittests, however it took time to get this one working:
get_storage_by_key (block_hash, storage_key)
In the end, I managed:
get_storage_by_key(storage_key='0x50a63a871aced22e88ee6466fe5aa5d9', block_hash=0x454...)
'0xd43593c715fdd31c61141abd04a99fd6822c8558854ccde39a5684e7a56da27d'
which is the result from Shawn's tutorial.
My feature request:
get_storage_by_key (block_hash, storage_key_name='Sudo Key')
and then the xxh6464('Sudo Key') is done within that function.
xxh6464('Sudo Key')
thanks for considering it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Like this?
#4
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hi @drandreaskrueger
Yeah thank you. We won't be merging that. We are working on a generalized solution for exactly this. You can find the spec here: https://github.com/w3f/Web3-collaboration/blob/master/grants/speculative/python_substrate_api.md
We hope to finish that by the end of the year. Therefore, I am closing this issue.
arjanz
No branches or pull requests
Hi! I am trying out your library. Very nice, that should save me time.
Without unittests, however it took time to get this one working:
In the end, I managed:
which is the result from Shawn's tutorial.
My feature request:
and then the
xxh6464('Sudo Key')
is done within that function.thanks for considering it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: