Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace Architecture Image #4

Closed
acloudiator opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Replace Architecture Image #4

acloudiator opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@acloudiator
Copy link
Contributor

We should replace the architecture Picture [1], with a new one (produced by more expert designers :) ).
Or at least, replace the polycube(logo) text with just polycube.

[1] https://github.com/polycube-network/polycube/blob/master/Documentation/images/polycube-archi.png

  • Matteo
@acloudiator acloudiator added this to To do in Review Documentation via automation Feb 19, 2019
@acloudiator acloudiator added this to the Website and Documentation milestone Feb 19, 2019
@acloudiator acloudiator added this to Needs triage in Issues Board Apr 17, 2019
@mauriciovasquezbernal
Copy link
Contributor

@frisso @mbertrone is this solved by #162?

@frisso
Copy link
Contributor

frisso commented Jul 11, 2019

Solved by #162

@frisso frisso closed this as completed Jul 11, 2019
Issues Board automation moved this from Needs triage to Closed Jul 11, 2019
@goldenrye
Copy link
Contributor

The new architecture diagram is more implementation oriented clearly explains what's the major "physical" components in the system. I think may be we should consider another logical representation as a complementary so that user can understand the logical functionalities in the system, something like the diagram below (just for demo purpose),
image

@frisso
Copy link
Contributor

frisso commented Jul 11, 2019

I like it, Jianwen. I can volunteer to change it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Issues Board
  
Closed
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants