We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The README says things like:
pair cbor.Decoder with obj.Unmarshaller to get a cbor deserializer.
cbor.Decoder
obj.Unmarshaller
When I look at https://godoc.org/github.com/polydawn/refmt/obj, I don't find obj.Unmarshaller there.
That's because it's spelled with a single l rather than double l in code:
https://godoc.org/github.com/polydawn/refmt/obj#NewUnmarshaler
I've done a quick search, and it's not just README that's inconsistent, there's some internal code that uses different variations:
Note, the Go project uses the single l variation. See https://dmitri.shuralyov.com/idiomatic-go#use-consistent-spelling-of-certain-words for reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks, Dmitri!
Sorry, something went wrong.
This should be fixed so I'm closing it. Let us know if you have any other comments. :)
No branches or pull requests
The README says things like:
When I look at https://godoc.org/github.com/polydawn/refmt/obj, I don't find
obj.Unmarshaller
there.That's because it's spelled with a single l rather than double l in code:
https://godoc.org/github.com/polydawn/refmt/obj#NewUnmarshaler
I've done a quick search, and it's not just README that's inconsistent, there's some internal code that uses different variations:
Note, the Go project uses the single l variation. See https://dmitri.shuralyov.com/idiomatic-go#use-consistent-spelling-of-certain-words for reference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: