Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve Range and Reverse #204

Open
SeanTAllen opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Improve Range and Reverse #204

SeanTAllen opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
0 - request - official

Comments

@SeanTAllen
Copy link
Member

A decent amount of conversation came up on #201 about the "bad API" and footgun nature of using Range to descend rather than ascend and about how Range and Reverse could be improved to work together for providing ascending and descending.

We'd love to see someone take up designing such changes and writing the RFC.
@ponylang-main ponylang-main added the discuss during sync Should be discussed during an upcoming sync label Nov 22, 2022
@SeanTAllen SeanTAllen mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2022
Merged
@SeanTAllen SeanTAllen removed the discuss during sync Should be discussed during an upcoming sync label Nov 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
0 - request - official
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SeanTAllen @ponylang-main