Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sequencer, Rework? #29

Closed
jspenger opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #33
Closed

Sequencer, Rework? #29

jspenger opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #33

Comments

@jspenger
Copy link
Member

The way in which a sequencer currently chooses the next atom in the sequence is strange. It takes a list of StreamRefs which have atoms available, and returns either Some StreamRef if a choice was made, or None if no choice was made. We should rethink this, if there is a better way to express this?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

New synchronous simulation runtime for testing. portals-project/portals
1 participant
@jspenger