Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bring Sage primitives into the testing fold, if we can #1

Open
posita opened this issue Nov 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Bring Sage primitives into the testing fold, if we can #1

posita opened this issue Nov 5, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@posita
Copy link
Collaborator

posita commented Nov 5, 2021 •
edited

We already opportunistically test (and coerce) numpy and sympy. Sage is currently modularizing its monolith. Is there a package that falls out of that small enough for us to include sage.rings.integer.Integer et al.? That way we could use those directly in testing, including accommodating numerator/denominator quirkiness.
@posita posita changed the title Bring Sage primitives into the fold, if we can Bring Sage primitives into the testing fold, if we can Nov 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@posita