-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Production ready? #136
Comments
I am one of the primary authors of this project, and I would currently not advise it for production use. Nearly everything it can do, CouchDB can do better/faster. pouchdb-find will be available as "Mango" in CouchDB 2.0, which is already in alpha and soon to be released. If you'd like to check it out, it's here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BtndYr-0KDQTqBSLVdJoR_8C5ObYjT1RBo_Qyh5ykdQ/edit# |
That said, I do think this is a great project for testing/debugging/developing/etc. I just wouldn't use it in any scenario where you could use CouchDB instead. CouchDB is more battle-tested and feature-complete. |
Thanks for your response. It is indeed very useful for what it does. —You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub |
Nolan. Is this still the state of things or is there a proven production quality server option for Pouch other than CouchDB? Would any of the LevelUP backends be considered production quality for server? |
@Brainsway-Cloud Now that CouchDB 2.0 is out for quite a while, are there any other use cases you have where you need to fall back to pouchdb-server? Asking out of curiosity, my requirement was the ease of Mango queries. tia! |
@SukantGujar -- I was hoping for a production quality adapter to an AWS DBaaS to avoid the need to administer the couchdb server. Maybe even figure a way to run Pouch serverless on AWS Lambda. |
Hi,
I have come into sort of a corner trying to use the very cool pouchdb-find with superlogin. The problem is that for both pdb-find and superlogin, the only common remote backend is pouchdb-server. Actually there's Cloudant as well, but it being cloud based, is not a choice for me.
So I wanted to quickly check with you that although termed "quick and dirty" CouchDB replacement, would pouchdb-server be reliable enough to power a simple (roughly thousand user) back-end? I am not talking about a heavy traffic site. What are the limits to which I can take it?
Thanks!
Sukant
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: