Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Production ready? #136

Closed
SukantGujar opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Production ready? #136

SukantGujar opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@SukantGujar
Copy link

Hi,

I have come into sort of a corner trying to use the very cool pouchdb-find with superlogin. The problem is that for both pdb-find and superlogin, the only common remote backend is pouchdb-server. Actually there's Cloudant as well, but it being cloud based, is not a choice for me.

So I wanted to quickly check with you that although termed "quick and dirty" CouchDB replacement, would pouchdb-server be reliable enough to power a simple (roughly thousand user) back-end? I am not talking about a heavy traffic site. What are the limits to which I can take it?

Thanks!
Sukant

@nolanlawson
Copy link
Member

I am one of the primary authors of this project, and I would currently not advise it for production use. Nearly everything it can do, CouchDB can do better/faster.

pouchdb-find will be available as "Mango" in CouchDB 2.0, which is already in alpha and soon to be released. If you'd like to check it out, it's here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BtndYr-0KDQTqBSLVdJoR_8C5ObYjT1RBo_Qyh5ykdQ/edit#

@nolanlawson
Copy link
Member

That said, I do think this is a great project for testing/debugging/developing/etc. I just wouldn't use it in any scenario where you could use CouchDB instead. CouchDB is more battle-tested and feature-complete.

@SukantGujar
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your response. It is indeed very useful for what it does.
Regards,
Sukant
On Apr 21, 2016 7:27 PM, Nolan Lawson notifications@github.com wrote:That said, I do think this is a great project for testing/debugging/developing/etc. I just wouldn't use it in any scenario where you could use CouchDB instead. CouchDB is more battle-tested and feature-complete.

—You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@Brainsway-Cloud
Copy link

Nolan. Is this still the state of things or is there a proven production quality server option for Pouch other than CouchDB? Would any of the LevelUP backends be considered production quality for server?

@SukantGujar
Copy link
Author

@Brainsway-Cloud Now that CouchDB 2.0 is out for quite a while, are there any other use cases you have where you need to fall back to pouchdb-server? Asking out of curiosity, my requirement was the ease of Mango queries. tia!

@Brainsway-Cloud
Copy link

@SukantGujar -- I was hoping for a production quality adapter to an AWS DBaaS to avoid the need to administer the couchdb server. Maybe even figure a way to run Pouch serverless on AWS Lambda.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants