Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Stored procedure execution #29

Open
pounard opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Stored procedure execution #29

pounard opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs evaluation Needs further investigation for being sure this is required or not
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@pounard
Copy link
Owner

pounard commented May 8, 2020

RIght now, nothing was planned for this, but we need to be able to execute stored procedure. It seems that using ext-pgsql, calling ->perform() or ->execute() doesn't work, so I'd go for adding an ->executeProcedure() method on the runner.
@pounard pounard added the enhancement New feature or request label May 8, 2020
@pounard pounard added this to the 2.0 milestone May 8, 2020
@pounard pounard added the needs evaluation Needs further investigation for being sure this is required or not label May 8, 2020
@pounard
Copy link
Owner Author

pounard commented May 8, 2020 •
edited

Tagging with "needs evualation" because with most RDBMS you may just call $runner->execute('SELECT my_procedure(?, ?)', ['foo', 'bar']).

@pounard pounard modified the milestones: 2.0, 2.1 May 9, 2020
@pounard pounard modified the milestones: 2.1, 2.2 May 27, 2020
@pounard pounard modified the milestones: 2.2, 3.1 Dec 1, 2020
@pounard pounard modified the milestones: 3.1, Backlog Jul 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs evaluation Needs further investigation for being sure this is required or not
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pounard