We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, I have scanned through the paper and already dive into the implementation part to observe data processing flow.
I found that our beta judgment rule
could be simplified into the following format with less numeric redundancies:
Because theta should not be large and positive, this method is much better looking for your paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your suggestion. Can you elaborate a bit more where you got this formula from? I don't see the reasoning behind it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing for the lack of activity.
No branches or pull requests
Hi, I have scanned through the paper and already dive into the implementation part to observe data processing flow.
I found that our beta judgment rule
could be simplified into the following format with less numeric redundancies:
Because theta should not be large and positive, this method is much better looking for your paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: