-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
question about data type #22
Comments
Hey @Juuustin, we currently only tested SuMa++ with the KITTI Odometry dataset. You could find more data type information on their original website. For testing your own dataset, the semantic inferring may not work very well since probably the sensor model and the environments where you obtain the laser data are quite different from those of KITTI. You may need to first train or finetune a new model to correctly infer the semantic information, which you could find more information in the rangenet++ project. Hope this helps. |
Thank you for your reply. I had a look at the KITTI Odometry dataset, there are at least 4 type of dataset: |
SuMa++ is a Lidar-only SLAM method. you therefore need only Velodyne laser data to run SuMa++. If you want to later evaluate the odometry results, you need also to download the calibration files and ground truth poses. |
Sounds great, I will have a try, thank you very much! |
Thank you for using our code. I will appreciate it a lot if you could star&fork this repo or cite the related paper if possible. |
No problem, I have stared it and I will cite it if it could run on my computer |
Thanks, if you have any problem please feel free to drop me a msg. |
Hi, I'd like to try my own lidar points cloud on this algorithm.
What kind of data type is needed to test?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: