Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2019. It is now read-only.

gem build warnings #98

Open
itspriddle opened this issue Jan 20, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

gem build warnings #98

itspriddle opened this issue Jan 20, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@itspriddle
Copy link
Contributor

These warnings appear when you build the gem. They aren't causing any issues, but we should refactor the gemspec to eliminate them:

gem build lumberg.gemspec

WARNING:  no homepage specified
WARNING:  open-ended dependency on json (>= 1.8.2) is not recommended
  if json is semantically versioned, use:
    add_runtime_dependency 'json', '~> 1.8', '>= 1.8.2'
WARNING:  pessimistic dependency on faraday (~> 0.9.0) may be overly strict
  if faraday is semantically versioned, use:
    add_runtime_dependency 'faraday', '~> 0.9', '>= 0.9.0'
WARNING:  pessimistic dependency on faraday_middleware (~> 0.9.0) may be overly strict
  if faraday_middleware is semantically versioned, use:
    add_runtime_dependency 'faraday_middleware', '~> 0.9', '>= 0.9.0'
WARNING:  pessimistic dependency on rspec (~> 2.10.0, development) may be overly strict
  if rspec is semantically versioned, use:
    add_development_dependency 'rspec', '~> 2.10', '>= 2.10.0'
WARNING:  pessimistic dependency on webmock (~> 1.18.0, development) may be overly strict
  if webmock is semantically versioned, use:
    add_development_dependency 'webmock', '~> 1.18', '>= 1.18.0'
WARNING:  pessimistic dependency on vcr (~> 2.9.2, development) may be overly strict
  if vcr is semantically versioned, use:
    add_development_dependency 'vcr', '~> 2.9', '>= 2.9.2'
WARNING:  pessimistic dependency on rake (~> 0.9.2.2, development) may be overly strict
  if rake is semantically versioned, use:
    add_development_dependency 'rake', '~> 0.9', '>= 0.9.2.2'
WARNING:  See http://guides.rubygems.org/specification-reference/ for help
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant