You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have seen some queries that do a ton of REGEXP_LIKE(..) AND v >= 0.9. And we generally maintain the order of the subexpressions. But in this case the trivial v >= 0.9 comparison is a lot cheaper. So rearranging them so all function calls are towards the latter part of the eval like v >= 0.9 AND REGEXP_LIKE(..), it could be more efficient.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have seen some queries that do a ton of
REGEXP_LIKE(..) AND v >= 0.9
. And we generally maintain the order of the subexpressions. But in this case the trivial v >= 0.9 comparison is a lot cheaper. So rearranging them so all function calls are towards the latter part of the eval likev >= 0.9 AND REGEXP_LIKE(..)
, it could be more efficient.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: