Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is Item.active/ItemVariation.active redundant with quotas? #36

Closed
raphaelm opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Is Item.active/ItemVariation.active redundant with quotas? #36

raphaelm opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@raphaelm
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rixx
Copy link
Member

rixx commented Aug 21, 2016

Still used to mark an item as deleted if there are already OrderPosition objects referencing this item. Maybe change the naming and explanation to reflect the usage?

@raphaelm
Copy link
Member Author

Nope, that is a very good reason. Closing this as wontfix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants