Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for neovim async #99

Closed
3 tasks done
mitermayer opened this issue Jan 15, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Add support for neovim async #99

mitermayer opened this issue Jan 15, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@mitermayer
Copy link
Member

mitermayer commented Jan 15, 2018

This issue will be used to track adding support for neovim async, at this moment neovim async is release under a feature flag, however as #96 there are still some bugs that needs to be fixed before the dark feature flag can be removed.

Users that want to experiment with the neovim async and/or want to help tackle this issue can enable it in the meantime by:

   g:prettier#nvim_unstable_async=1

While this issue is open the neovim behaviour will keep working as before by defaulting to sync

@FabioAntunes
Copy link

I would gladly help in anything you guys need, except scripting. Let me know if you need any help on testing.

@mitermayer mitermayer mentioned this issue Mar 25, 2018
13 tasks
@mitermayer
Copy link
Member Author

This issue is been tackled on the release 1.x branch and will be closed once vim-prettier 1.0 is released.

@mitermayer
Copy link
Member Author

This feature is now available on 1.x release branch

@mitermayer
Copy link
Member Author

@FabioAntunes if you have some time could you try out the 1.x release branch ?

@mitermayer mitermayer added this to Backlog in vim-prettier 1.0 May 16, 2018
@FabioAntunes
Copy link

@mitermayer Sorry for the super late response I have been using ALE lately, I will give it a try if you need

@mitermayer
Copy link
Member Author

@FabioAntunes,

Not a problem! If you have some time please feel to try our 1.x branch as it have neovim support for async already working in there

@mitermayer
Copy link
Member Author

I am closing this issue as this is now resolved on 1.x branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants