Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow apk to be downloaded outside Google Play too. #29

Closed
Mikaela opened this issue Oct 23, 2012 · 18 comments
Closed

Allow apk to be downloaded outside Google Play too. #29

Mikaela opened this issue Oct 23, 2012 · 18 comments

Comments

@Mikaela
Copy link

Mikaela commented Oct 23, 2012

I have Impression I10 tablet, which doesn't have Google Play officially, so I cannot install Prey with it.

I have looked for the .apk, but neither preyproject.com or GitHub downloads section provides .apk file.

I install everything to that tablet with F-Droid and it would be nice to have Prey there. If I understood correctly, there are some issues which prevent Prey from getting there.

@xuhdev
Copy link

xuhdev commented Dec 19, 2014

Please also release apk files for sideloading!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2015

Hi, guys. I know it's terribly late, but I think it's still appropriate to explain why the APK is not availabe.

Prey for Android relies on Google Cloud Messaging. Without that software it won't be able to do anything, because it's what we use to push instructions from the Prey servers. If devices don't have Google Play, then they most probably won't have Google Cloud Messaging either. Providing the APK would be an invitation to a "Prey doesn't work" flow of issues and emails.

I'm closing this. Please feel free to reopen it in case you have further questions.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Feb 6, 2015
This was referenced Feb 6, 2015
@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Apr 17, 2015
@IzzySoft
Copy link

Requesting reopen for the reason of corrected facts:

If devices don't have Google Play, then they most probably won't have Google Cloud Messaging either.

Doesn't stand. There's the microG Project (formerly known as NOGAPPS) available here on Github, which provides most GServices – especially GCM. I use that for almost 2 years now without issues (see my article on it). And it's not the "small niche product" – many "Google refusers" use it meanwhile, just check their XDA threads :)

So may I suggest to provide the .apk along with your releases/ – and while waiting to be listed on F-Droid, I'd offer picking it up for my F-Droid compatible repo, where updates usually would be available within 24h?

@IzzySoft
Copy link

My last comment being more than 4 months ago: May I kindly ask for a statement, as you (understandingly) close new requests in favor of this? If it stays a "No", we'll have to live with that – but I'm still hoping for a "yes, with the next release" 😜

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Jun 4, 2017

Any news here? I think Prey was over even available on F-Droid, but I could be wrong.

@IzzySoft
Copy link

With this issue dating from 2015, newer issues on the topic being closed as dupes to this one, and no comment for over 2 years, it looks like we're ignored and there's no interest. So I'm removing it from my pending list, and look out for alternatives.

Oh, and hi again, @rugk 😛

@Kristinita
Copy link

Kristinita commented Dec 7, 2017

So I'm removing it from my pending list, and look out for alternatives.

@IzzySoft , I'm sorry, what Prey alternative you currently using (without Google Play services dependency)?

Thanks.

@IzzySoft
Copy link

IzzySoft commented Dec 7, 2017

@Kristinita I'm using none at the moment. I was just thinking about it. If I would use any, it should be open source and available outside of Playstore (preferably directly from the F-Droid main repo). Prey'd fit the first condition, but unfortunately doesn't fit the second and doesn't seem interested even. And not even answering to such requests in any way but simply ignoring it makes it seem a bad candidate.

And @rugk Prey is neither in the main repo nor in the archive of F-Droid, just checked to make sure. A look at the gradle file will tell you why (4 of the GMS dependencies @Kristinita was mentioning).

@WPFilmmaker
Copy link

Any news 2 years later?

@IzzySoft
Copy link

I gave up on Prey. Not even answering after 3 years (from my microG argument) is a clear statement to me ("we don't care"). As for the GMS argument, apart from microG if one has to use GCM here, there are alternatives – as Tutanota and other apps show.

They explain there that other projects did the same in different ways :
"We’ve made a research on how others (Signal, Wire, Conversations, Riot, Facebook, Mastodon) have been solving similar problems. We had several options in mind, including WebSockets, MQTT, Server Sent Events and HTTP/2 Server Push."

They finally chose SSE and succeeded. So if there's a will, there are possibilities to solve this. I'm just afraid there's no will here…

(PS: apologies if this sounds offending. It's not meant that way, it's "just" frustration)

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Dec 31, 2019

Wut? What happened to this issue?

  1. Why was it closed? An F-Droid/apk out of Google Play would still be nice.
  2. How was it even closed? GitHub does not show which user closed it, which is not a thing GitHub allowed to do? Can one close an issue without saying who closed it? uhm wtf????

grafik

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Dec 31, 2019

Wtttf? Now my comment is shown above the closing label???

grafik

See also this snapshot: https://archive.is/9JKZu

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Dec 31, 2019

Okay, contacted GitHub support and reported this behavior/this issue as a bug here. 😄 (ticket ID 509283)

@IzzySoft
Copy link

@rugk scroll up a bit:

Selection_127

The label at the end of the thread is just a reminder – especially for cases like this where the discussion continues. And it's always at the end of the list, so you see it when creating a new comment.

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Dec 31, 2019

Lol really, never noticed that? This must be new… really…

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Dec 31, 2019

(Maybe it's because the user who closed it has since been deleted, i.e. is a ghost now.)

@IzzySoft
Copy link

So maybe we should then ping a team member who is a real person and has not been ghosted yet – like @oaliaga? A lot can happen in the 7 years since this issue was opened, even in the 4 years since it was ghosted. Maybe there's some hope left after all?

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Jan 7, 2020

BTW about the bug reported to GitHub: I received this answer:

It looks like we'll add that extra "This issue was closed" timeline event when the issue was closed by a user that's since deleted their account (@ghost). That event will always appear at the end of the issue, regardless of any new comments.

I agree this is a little confusing and I'm going to pass this on as feedback to our team!

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants