Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeout SCL3711 mfoc #276

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Timeout SCL3711 mfoc #276

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 14, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Hi, i have a Problem with libnfc and a mifare classic 1k card:

System:
Linux debian 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.54-2 x86_64 GNU/Linux



root@debian:~/mfcuk-read-only# nfc-list
nfc-list uses libnfc libnfc-1.7.1-10-gbd92f74
NFC device: SCM Micro / SCL3711-NFC&RW opened
1 ISO14443A passive target(s) found:
ISO/IEC 14443A (106 kbps) target:
    ATQA (SENS_RES): 00  04
       UID (NFCID1): 77  32  a8  f2
      SAK (SEL_RES): 88



ISO/IEC 14443A (106 kbps) target:
    ATQA (SENS_RES): 00  04
* UID size: single
* bit frame anticollision supported
       UID (NFCID1): 77  32  a8  f2
      SAK (SEL_RES): 88
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 14443-4
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 18092

Fingerprinting based on MIFARE type Identification Procedure:
* SmartMX with MIFARE 1K emulation
Other possible matches based on ATQA & SAK values:
* Mifare Classic 1K Infineon

Try to authenticate to all sectors with default keys...
Symbols: '.' no key found, '/' A key found, '\' B key found, 'x' both keys found
[Key: ffffffffffff] -> [................]
[Key: a0a1a2a3a4a5] -> [/...............]
[Key: d3f7d3f7d3f7] -> [/...............]
[Key: 000000000000] -> [/...............]
[Key: b0b1b2b3b4b5] -> [/...............]
[Key: 4d3a99c351dd] -> [/...............]
[Key: 1a982c7e459a] -> [/...............]
[Key: aabbccddeeff] -> [/...............]
[Key: 714c5c886e97] -> [/...............]
[Key: 587ee5f9350f] -> [/...............]
[Key: a0478cc39091] -> [/...............]
[Key: 533cb6c723f6] -> [/...............]
[Key: 8fd0a4f256e9] -> [/...............]

Sector 00 -  FOUND_KEY   [A]  Sector 00 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 01 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 01 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 02 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 02 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 03 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 03 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 04 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 04 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 05 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 05 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 06 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 06 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 07 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 07 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 08 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 08 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 09 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 09 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 10 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 10 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 11 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 11 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 12 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 12 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 13 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 13 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 14 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 14 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]
Sector 15 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [A]  Sector 15 -  UNKNOWN_KEY [B]


Using sector 00 as an exploit sector
Sector: 1, type A, probe 0, distance 19638 .....
Sector: 1, type A, probe 1, distance 19646 .....
Found Key: A [e251a9da734d]
Sector: 2, type A, probe 0, distance 19644 .....
Found Key: A [355c6b0b7418]
Sector: 3, type A, probe 0, distance 19638 .....
Found Key: A [9fbb4e58fb4b]
Sector: 4, type A, probe 0, distance 19640 .....
Found Key: A [49967cda4f17]
Sector: 5, type A
Found Key: A [49967cda4f17]
nfc_initiator_init: Timeout


Original issue reported on code.google.com by pingu5400 on 4 Apr 2014 at 9:10

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author


Using sector 00 as an exploit sector
Sector: 1, type A, probe 0, distance 19646 .....
Found Key: A [e251a9da734d]
Sector: 2, type A, probe 0, distance 19640 .....
Found Key: A [355c6b0b7418]
Sector: 3, type A, probe 0, distance 19640 .....
Sector: 3, type A, probe 1, distance 18882 .....
Sector: 3, type A, probe 2, distance 19646 ....nfc_initiator_init: Timeout

Original comment by pingu5400 on 4 Apr 2014 at 9:11

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I can confirm this issue.
And also I could confirm pingu5400's solution works!

Thanks

Original comment by changxia...@gmail.com on 30 May 2014 at 5:18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant