Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancements for bundle #6

Open
mateomorris opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Enhancements for bundle #6

mateomorris opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
future Work on this later ;)

Comments

@mateomorris
Copy link
Collaborator

mateomorris commented Aug 5, 2020

Source

At the moment, the only enhancement that is made on the final bundle is instant.page. But there's no reason more couldn't be done, like Clayton suggests: "offline support, code splitting, smart preloading." These would probably all be options on the developer side, and include other things like: optimize images, append .html to relative links (for a static site), minify bundle, etc.

@mateomorris mateomorris added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 5, 2020
@mariusfaber98
Copy link

I really like the idea of Instant.pages, but I think all stuff like this should be optional. I want to decide on my own what extra features are included on my website. Personally, I would use flying pages + turbolinks for preloading. Because since it is a static website I don't really care about server load.
https://wpspeedmatters.com/quicklink-vs-instant-page-vs-flying-pages/

@mateomorris
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Agree it should be optional. I'll leave it in there for now unless you're having to remove it manually.

@Dark-Developer93 Dark-Developer93 added wontfix This will not be worked on future Work on this later ;) and removed enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on labels Feb 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
future Work on this later ;)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants