Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use nfft rather than pynfft? #31

Closed
jakevdp opened this issue Apr 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Use nfft rather than pynfft? #31

jakevdp opened this issue Apr 14, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@jakevdp
Copy link
Collaborator

jakevdp commented Apr 14, 2017

I just released a lightweight package that computes fast NFFTs, using only numpy and scipy rather than a custom compiled package. It's a much lighter dependency (pure Python, pip installable), and the speed is comparable to pynfft (faster in many cases).

Take a look, and let me know what you think. It might be worth changing to depend on that just for the sake of simplifying our installation requirements here.

@jakevdp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jakevdp commented Apr 14, 2017

Oh, here's the link: http://github.com/jakevdp/nfft/

@johnh2o2
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey Jake -- replaced pynfft with nfft. Thanks for a great NFFT implementation!

@jakevdp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jakevdp commented Jul 13, 2017

Great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants