Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change skin upload wording to Wide/Slim #2409

Closed
1 task done
Aces-and-Jacks opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1609
Closed
1 task done

Change skin upload wording to Wide/Slim #2409

Aces-and-Jacks opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1609
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Aces-and-Jacks
Copy link

Role

I play Minecraft

Suggestion

I want the skin option to say Wide/Slim instead of Steve/Alex

Benefit

So I won't be confused

This suggestion is unique

  • I have searched the issue tracker and did not find an issue describing my suggestion, especially not one that has been rejected.

You may use the editor below to elaborate further.

I didn't see any other issue made about this, so sorry if it's a duplicate.

Anyway, while I do like how it is atm I feel like it'd create confusion for anyone doing a skin change. Took me a minute to figure out which is which, but currently minecraft shows it as wide/slim. So I feel changing the wording to match would be best

@Aces-and-Jacks Aces-and-Jacks added the enhancement New feature or request label May 17, 2024
@Trial97
Copy link
Member

Trial97 commented May 17, 2024

This will be fixed in #1609
But the naming is classic/Slim

@Aces-and-Jacks
Copy link
Author

Oh ok. Well that's just as good, thank you

@Fleepe
Copy link

Fleepe commented May 17, 2024

I hope this feature will be available very soon because skin management is the only thing that makes me use the default minecraft launcher.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants