Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DL_ARM_NEON_OPTIONAL vs DL_ARM_NEON #23

Closed
EricDavies opened this issue Oct 17, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

DL_ARM_NEON_OPTIONAL vs DL_ARM_NEON #23

EricDavies opened this issue Oct 17, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@EricDavies
Copy link

I just did a pull today and had problems building. I think it's because we probably need to be getting DL_ARM_NEON_OPTIONAL defined instead of DL_ARM_NEON. Here is the writeup I put on the discuss-webrtc (figuring that you probably don't set the DL_ARM_NEON). https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/discuss-webrtc/UtA_12H3fMI

My guess is that it's not your code setting the DL_ARM_NEON, but I thought I'd bring it to your attention just in case.

Thank you for providing these scripts. Trying to compile the webrtc library with Google's out of date instructions is a horrific experience :-).

@aaalaniz
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Eric,

I think this issue has been resolved. Please try again and let us know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants