Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

make it more clear that size() is needed when you move out of tutorial? #68

Open
shiffman opened this issue Apr 23, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

make it more clear that size() is needed when you move out of tutorial? #68

shiffman opened this issue Apr 23, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
video revision

Comments

@shiffman
Copy link
Member

http://forum.processing.org/two/discussion/3712/problem-with-2-1-1-32bit
@shiffman shiffman changed the title make it more clear that size() is needed when you move out of tutorial make it more clear that size() is needed when you move out of tutorial? Apr 23, 2014
@shiffman
Copy link
Member Author

Revisiting the tutorial, I think we are pretty clear about size(). Maybe a non-issue. Will leave this open for now I guess. . .

@shiffman shiffman mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
video revision
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@shiffman @scottgarner