New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extending support to biopython>1.79
#1723
Comments
Hello, yes, I think this should be fine. I think the main thing that affected us in the shift to 1.80 was the loss of pairwise2 but we now have a way to handle that, so it should be fine. We’ll have to try it and see. |
Thanks fro your quick reply @jamesmkrieger, looking forward to it! |
Of course, everything is always more complicated than one would think. The output from alignment has some different format in later biopython versions so we'll have to look into what the differences are and change some functions that use it. |
I have tested everything now and there was something to fix in #1816 but now I think we're there once it passes the tests and is merged |
I tried building bb2b63f with biopython 1.81 and it failed
|
I've tested writeMMTF enough now and merged it |
Hello ProDy developers.
I have been working with your package and we are trying to stay updated with dependencies. Recently I bumped ProDy to 2.4.0 and found out that it depends on
biopython<=1.79
. Effectively, in yoursetup.py
biopython is restricted to<=1.79
(added in d65a4c1).I am certain you have strong reasons to pin the version of Biopython. However, I was wondering if ProDy devs have any plans of extending support for ProDy in higher versions of Biopython in the short term. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: