We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi.
I use Jquery Repeater to duplicate a few fields, but the rule generated by JSValidation doesn't seem to work with it.
The field in question is the following: <input name="ep_is_default" type="checkbox">
<input name="ep_is_default" type="checkbox">
After it being duplicated it now looks like this (First one): <input name="group-prof_entities[0][ep_is_default][]" type="checkbox">
<input name="group-prof_entities[0][ep_is_default][]" type="checkbox">
The rule generated doesn't match any element. group-prof_entities[*][ep_is_default]
group-prof_entities[*][ep_is_default]
The difference is that "[]" in the element name.
Any ideas on how to fix this?
I've tried to manually delete the "[]" in the generated name, and the rule apparently worked fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@OppPMatos did you get any solution?
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is an issue with array validation. Duplicate of either #333 or #297
No branches or pull requests
Hi.
I use Jquery Repeater to duplicate a few fields, but the rule generated by JSValidation doesn't seem to work with it.
The field in question is the following:
<input name="ep_is_default" type="checkbox">
After it being duplicated it now looks like this (First one):
<input name="group-prof_entities[0][ep_is_default][]" type="checkbox">
The rule generated doesn't match any element.
group-prof_entities[*][ep_is_default]
The difference is that "[]" in the element name.
Any ideas on how to fix this?
I've tried to manually delete the "[]" in the generated name, and the rule apparently worked fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: