Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Git repos can be created outside the $GITHOME directory #32

Open
Rogdham opened this issue Nov 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Git repos can be created outside the $GITHOME directory #32

Rogdham opened this issue Nov 16, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@Rogdham
Copy link

Rogdham commented Nov 16, 2014

This is a security-related bug

Problem & POC

The name of the repos can contain sequences such as ../, which allows the repositories to be stored outside the $GITHOME directory.

For example, the command git clone git@example.com:../../tmp/foo creates the repo in the directory /tmp/foo (with default configuration).

Also, one could create a repo named foo, then someone else a repo named foo/bar, which will completely hides the existence of the second repo. Also, replace bar for refs and you have an other error.

Solution

The solution is to filter the allowed repository name and/or to escape them.

The following code is to be changed:

parse_repo_from_ssh_command() {
  awk '{print $2}' | perl -pe 's/(?<!\\)'\''//g' | sed 's/\\'\''/'\''/g' | strip_root_slash
}

However, I don't have the perl knowledge to be sure to understand the code already, so I leave the fix to others.

Here is my suggestion:

  • Make sure that there is no / in the repo name. Exit right away with an error message if there is.
  • Also, it may be a good idea to check that the repo name does not start with a dot, so that a simple ls $GITHOME will show all repos.

Edit: Not allowing / in the repo name may be asking for too much (e.g. can not use user/something as repo names a la GitHub). Alternatively, we could replace / for some character (-? _? a space?), but this may lead to conflicts (e.g. user/something and user-something would be the same repo).

I will happily review commits aiming at fixing this flaw, provided they don't use any perl (as I don't have any knowledge in the area).

@Paperback
Copy link
Contributor

For me, the git user cannot write outside their home directory so this fails with permission denied. I know it's best practise not to just hope for sane permissions particularly when dealing with security, but is there a sane use case where someone wants relative paths when pushing, for instance pushing configuration files into etc?

Instead of removing / from the repo name, perhaps it's better to just disallow relative paths by removing ..

Also that perl call has been replaced by sed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants