Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate timed request message with IM command #8363

Closed
yunhanw-google opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12567
Closed

Integrate timed request message with IM command #8363

yunhanw-google opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12567

Comments

@yunhanw-google
Copy link
Contributor

yunhanw-google commented Jul 14, 2021

Client:
Adding support to CommandSender to send Timed Invoke messages.
Add support to cluster objects to retrieve metadata about whether timed invoke is needed.
Server:
Adding support to CommandHandler to process Timed Invoke messages.
Add annotations to the XML to support tagging commands as needing timed invoke.
Add metadata to generated Ember command descriptors to indicate if timed invoke is needed

@yunhanw-google yunhanw-google changed the title Integrate timed request message with IM command and Write Integrate timed request message with IM command Sep 10, 2021
@yunhanw-google yunhanw-google added this to the Test Event 7.5 milestone Oct 19, 2021
@bzbarsky-apple bzbarsky-apple linked a pull request Dec 4, 2021 that will close this issue
@bzbarsky-apple
Copy link
Contributor

Adding support to CommandSender to send Timed Invoke messages.

Done in #12465

Add support to cluster objects to retrieve metadata about whether timed invoke is needed.

Done in #12380

Adding support to CommandHandler to process Timed Invoke messages.

Done in #12389

Add annotations to the XML to support tagging commands as needing timed invoke.

Done in #12365

Add metadata to generated Ember command descriptors to indicate if timed invoke is needed

Done in #12389 and #12365

At this point, just timed write client remains, which is #12567

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants