Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove flatpak_base_image #808

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 6, 2018

Conversation

rcerven
Copy link
Member

@rcerven rcerven commented Oct 19, 2018

Signed-off-by: Robert Cerven rcerven@redhat.com

Copy link
Contributor

@mlangsdorf mlangsdorf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have concerns about changing the API for Arrangements 5 and earlier.

@@ -126,14 +124,10 @@ def set_params(self,
self.koji_parent_build.value = koji_parent_build
self.koji_upload_dir.value = koji_upload_dir
self.flatpak.value = flatpak
self.flatpak_base_image.value = flatpak_base_image
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll need to change atomic_reactor/schemas/user_params.json in atomic-reactor

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok will make that change

@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ def __init__(self):
self.koji_kerberos_principal = BuildParam("koji_kerberos_principal", allow_none=True)
self.koji_kerberos_keytab = BuildParam("koji_kerberos_keytab", allow_none=True)
self.flatpak = BuildParam("flatpak", default=False)
self.flatpak_base_image = BuildParam("flatpak_base_image", allow_none=True)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you want to change build_request v1 here - that changes the behavior of Arrangement 5- systems.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we're fine with making changes that only affect flatpak builds, as they are not working prior to arrangement 6 in any case.

@rcerven rcerven force-pushed the flatpak_fix branch 3 times, most recently from 490998b to e57f2bd Compare October 26, 2018 17:59
Signed-off-by: Robert Cerven <rcerven@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@MartinBasti MartinBasti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MartinBasti MartinBasti merged commit cdaf119 into containerbuildsystem:master Nov 6, 2018
@MartinBasti
Copy link
Contributor

Release notes:

  • flatpak base image is now properly loaded from a reactor-config-map

@rcerven rcerven deleted the flatpak_fix branch April 8, 2019 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants