Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sparse matrix format in Chrono::Flex #4

Open
melanz opened this issue Dec 17, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Sparse matrix format in Chrono::Flex #4

melanz opened this issue Dec 17, 2013 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@melanz
Copy link
Contributor

melanz commented Dec 17, 2013

Suggestion from Radu:

Apart from the marginally more complicated specification of the index arrays, is there a reason why you use COO format as opposed to say CSR? If I am not mistaken, the cusp::multiply() algorithm should be more efficient for SPMV operations when using CSR vs. COO.

@ghost ghost assigned melanz Dec 17, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant