Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Request for exclusion of .0 and .255 from IP generations #41

Closed
yehgdotnet opened this issue Nov 3, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #45 or #58
Closed

Request for exclusion of .0 and .255 from IP generations #41

yehgdotnet opened this issue Nov 3, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #45 or #58
Assignees
@Mzack9999
Labels
Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.

Comments

@yehgdotnet
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Scanning on .0 and .255 is not necessary to be scanned. It's theoretically possible to assign .0 IP. But it's rare in practical network. .255 is always a broadcast IP.

Describe the solution you'd like
I wish the tool provides a switch not to include .0 and .255 in output generation.

Thank you Team for simple yet awesome useful tool.
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 linked a pull request Nov 30, 2021 that will close this issue
Adding flags to skip base and broadcast ips #45
Merged
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 self-assigned this Nov 30, 2021
@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 added Status: Review Needed The issue has a PR attached to it which needs to be reviewed Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. labels Nov 30, 2021
@forgedhallpass forgedhallpass changed the title [Feature] Request for exclusion of .0 and .255 from IP generations Request for exclusion of .0 and .255 from IP generations Dec 2, 2021
@ehsandeep ehsandeep added Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. and removed Status: Review Needed The issue has a PR attached to it which needs to be reviewed labels Dec 3, 2021
@ehsandeep ehsandeep linked a pull request Apr 23, 2022 that will close this issue
v0.0.9 #58
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Mzack9999 Mzack9999

Labels
Status: Completed Nothing further to be done with this issue. Awaiting to be closed. Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@yehgdotnet @ehsandeep @Mzack9999